Loading Posts...

Pluto Should Be Reclassified As A Planet, Astronomers Say

It’s the cosmic debate that just won’t die. Ever since the International Astronomical Union tightened up its definition of a planet in 2006 and demoted Pluto to dwarf-planet status, some astronomers have been fighting back. The latest volley comes from a study led by University of Central Florida planetary scientist Philip Metzger, who says the IAU got it wrong.
main article image

Metzger refers to Pluto as “the second-most complex, interesting planet in our solar system” and calls the IAU definition “sloppy.” He suggests instead that planets should be classified based on being large enough that their gravity allows them to be spherical. Metzger points to Pluto’s moons and its complex geology and atmosphere, saying “It’s more dynamic and alive than Mars.”

Image result for Pluto Should be Reclassified as a Planet, Astronomers Say

This isn’t the first time scientists have questioned the IAU’s definition of a planet. NASA’s New Horizons team, which guided the spacecraft in a close-up study of Pluto, proposed a radical new definition for planets in 2017. That proposal would return Pluto to planet status, but also qualify some moons and other solar system objects as planets. IAU press officer Lars Lindberg Christensen tells CNET there have been no resolutions proposed to revisit Pluto’s classification.

“It is nevertheless good and healthy to debate such topics,” he says.

The Metzger-led study, which focuses on how asteroids came to be classified differently than planets in scientific literature, was published online this week in the journal Icarus.